Full-day public kindergarten is an essential
part of education choice
October 5, 2004
By Ellen Shemitz
President
Children’s Alliance of New Hampshire
"Choice" is a popular buzzword in education and political
circles these days. Ironically, those years that are the most important
in creating children’s ability and appetite to learn — birth
through age 5 — are those in which many parents have few choices,
if any at all. New Hampshire’s leaders can give parents more choice
and improve student performance by including public kindergarten among
the state’s minimum standards.
It’s hard to believe that as the rest of the country invests in
quality education experiences for 3- and 4-year-olds, here in New Hampshire
we’re still talking about kindergarten. Sure, the conversation
has shifted in recent years. More people now understand the educational
and developmental boost children get from early education and kindergarten.
More people now understand the relationship between quality early learning
and long-term educational success. And now, the state Board of Education
has recommended that the state require every community to offer public
kindergarten.
At the Children’s Alliance, we believe the state should require
and provide funding for every community to provide both half- and full-day
public kindergarten options and allow parents to choose which is best
for their children and their families. The reasons for a full-day kindergarten
option are both educational and economic.
Children who attend full-day kindergarten start grade school more ready
to learn. Studies of the effects of full-day (defined as about six hours)
kindergarten have found that students, particularly from disadvantaged
families, learn more than in half-day programs. Studies that have tracked
kindergarten students into grade school report strikingly similar results.
Kids who had attended full-day kindergartens were better prepared to
succeed in first grade: they were more-independent learners, more engaged
in the classroom and more thoughtful. They also were more socially and
emotionally prepared: worked more productively with other students,
related more positively and confidently with teachers, and less prone
to anger, blaming, withdrawal and shyness.
The economic argument is two-fold. In the short term, quality full-day
kindergarten supports today’s workforce. In New Hampshire, 61
percent of parents with children under age 6 depend on family, friends
and center-based professionals to care for their children while they
work. Those parents are more productive workers when their child is
settled for the day in a high-quality program, rather than being shuttled
from home to a friend’s house to kindergarten to day care.
In the longer term, quality full-day kindergarten creates and strengthens
tomorrow’s workforce. Children who love to read and learn at age
5 are more likely to stay in school, graduate from high school, and
be good learners for the rest of their lives.
Our state has been enormously successful importing workers for its
burgeoning high-tech industries from other states, but must begin to
grow its own high-skill workforce. More than half of all new jobs being
created in New Hampshire require a bachelors degree.
The only argument against requiring public kindergarten, full- or half-day,
is New Hampshire’s method of education funding. The simple truth
is that our reliance on local property taxes to finance education is
the sole reason that 16 communities, containing about 20 percent of
the state’s 5-year-olds, still don’t provide public kindergarten.
New Hampshire’s Constitution says that what the state mandates,
the state must pay for. So if our minimum standards include public kindergarten
for all, the state must fund kindergarten for all.
Over the coming months, this clear mandate will be blurred. Instead
of requiring communities to offer public kindergarten, Governor Benson
supports giving parents of 5-year-olds $2,000 cash vouchers that could
be used toward tuition at a public or private kindergarten. The call
for vouchers is an end run around public kindergarten. Their use would
allow the state to continue to avoid the true costs of education, and,
because $2,000 is but a fraction of what most all-day private kindergarten
costs, would send cash to families that can already afford kindergarten
tuition while denying education to those less able to pay.
It is time for New Hampshire to choose to support its children and its
working parents. Let’s put an end to our distinction as the only
state in the country that does not offer public kindergarten for all
children. We ask all citizens to demand that their political leaders
support public kindergarten so that our youngest children enter school
ready to learn and our state continues to thrive.